SoftwareExpertsEveryoneRespects

Last edit October 4, 2004
I will write this page. If anyone disagrees, take the name out.


  • CharlesBabbage, he tried to made it with mechanics, and he got it right
    • Very important, but he was a hardware guy, not software
  • AlonzoChurch, for the lambda calculus
    • Important work, but he was a mathematician and did not have computers in mind

Everyone? Mostly everyone.

Martin Fowler is still a bit anti-RDBMS for my tastes. He still proposes using OO-built navigational structures in place of or in addition to (OnceAndOnlyOnce violation) the database. He also tends to "see" things as subtypes, which I tend not to find a safe long-term design decision choice (ThereAreNoTypes). -- top OnceAndOnlyOnceDoesNotImplyGoldenHammer