Some questions and answers on the establishment of
LabeledBlocks
Q: Are references used, or "labeled blocks"?
A: LabeledBlocks could contain markers to ExistingBlocks, such as functions or curly-brace blocks.
- If references are used, they could also include (but not require) a "closing" marker
- Each and every word, sentence, paragraph, description, chapter, program, and process which exists
would qualify as H
yperLinks, and could be made reachable by existing or provided interfaces and/or processes.
Q: Are the actual categories to be stored in the source code, or in a separate structure/database that links via a marker-ID?
A: Neither, as they would
- simply exist, and
- have an addressable, reachable location.
- This could include Artifacts of different location, scope, size and be reachable as entire storage artifacts, such as a drive, or directories, sub-directories, documents, pages, processes, or states
Q: Similar questions apply to meta-data.
Q: If a coded approach, should it simply have an ID number, with the rest of the info kept in a separate database or system?
A: That would make it an indexed database and would severely limit flexibility and extensibility.
Q: Should markers be hand-keyed or machine-generated?
A: Each Artifact should be separately identifiable and exist so that it can be made reachable via a HyperProcess or HyperTag.
ExternalReferences