Temp NoteThis
MicroSoft page is under an "Article Improvement Drive" management process. Please write in
DavidLiu homepage if you have comments / requests / etc. Elsewhere I am engaging a C2 person who said he has knowledge on the subject, and hoping to get useful advice before end of that lengthy discussion. --
DavidLiu Oct05 (last significant page review in mid 2004)
EnterpriseServices is the name of a library that is shipped as part of the .NET Framework v1.x and v2.x. It lives under the System.Enterprise
Services namespace. You can find the documentation home here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnentsrv/html/netenterpriseandcomplus.asp . Think of
EnterpriseServices as the .NET (managed code) developer's interface to
ComPlus features, which remain available in Windows to developers using C++, and VB.
A good review is here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dndotnet/html/entserv.asp
-
- For clarity, the term EnterpriseServices is a Microsoft invention, and it has nothing to do with the thing that came along later, called EnterpriseServiceBus (ESB).
ComPlus delivers a set of services for component-oriented applications, that need higher scale or reliability.
EnterpriseServices is just a .NET managed API to take advantage of those services.
EnterpriseServices does not introduce new services, new capabilities, but merely new interfaces to take advantage of the
ComPlus services.
ServicedComponents is the name given to
DotNet objects that interact with
ComPlus, see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconservicedcomponentoverview.asp . In fact, the traditional model is to build a component that derives from System.Enterprise
Services.Serviced
Component, and then apply attributes onto that component -= attributes that govern transaction behavior, security, pooling, and so on.
However, it is also possible to take advantage of
EnterpriseServices without deriving from this special class. For this you can use Services without Components, or SwC.
A roadmap on
EnterpriseServices is available from Microsoft at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q308672
EnterpriseServices security
Because
EnterpriseServices is a
DotNet layer to access
ComPlus,
EnterpriseServices employs the concept of a
role that is parallel to the
ComPlus feature. This role complements the security and access control that is built-in to
DotNet, see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetsec/html/SecNetHT12.asp
See also
WebServicesSecurity, and Microsoft specific part of
WebServicesExtensions
EnterpriseServices object pooling
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q317336&ID=kb;en-us;Q317336&SD=MSDN
Transaction management aspects
see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnbda/html/BOAGag.asp
Migration from DistributedInternetArchitecture
See
http://www.microsoft.com/germany/library/resourcesmod/dna2net_design_path.doc
Links to get started
In future, when
MicrosoftIndigo kicks over, the need to delve into the
pre MicrosoftManagedCode world of
ComPlus, through
EnterpriseServices classes, may disappear. It may disappear sooner than arrival of
WindowsLonghorn, as
WindowsXp will be getting the client capabilities of
MicrosoftIndigo.
-
- Hmm, this doesn't make sense. There is no need to go into native code in order to use EnterpriseServices. Sure, there is infrastructure that gets tickled, when you use System.EnterpriseServices that is written in native code (C++), but that is not code you need to see or be aware of. -- DinoChiesa
See also
WindowsCommunicationFoundation (previously codenamed
Indigo), which will be the Microsoft technology component that will include
EnterpriseServices. The significance of
EnterpriseServices may fade, but its link to integrating legacy
DistributedInternetArchitecture is expected to continue.
-
- No again. WCF does not subsume or include EnterpriseServices. WCF integrates with Windows platform capabilities, like the distributed transaction coordinator, in order to support web services protocols like WS-AT. But to say that WCF "includes" EnterpriseServices is incorrect. -- DinoChiesa
CategoryDotNet,
CategoryMicrosoft,
CategoryEnterpriseComputingConcerns