In
RalphJohnson and
BrianFoote's paper,
Designing Reusable Classes [
http://www.laputan.org/drc/drc.html], they state:
-
- "Another way to customize a framework is to supply it with a set of components that provide application specific behavior. Each of these components will be required to implement a particular protocol. All or most of the components might be provided by a component library. The interface between components can be defined by protocol, so the user needs to understand only the external interface of the components. Thus, this kind of a framework is called a black-box framework."
To me, this rings well with what we're calling a
ComponentFramework. The protocols we are dealing with are
AbstractInteractions communicated via interfaces. And of course
BypassingAbstractions is an important theme we see in the context resulting from
LayeredFrameworks where black-box frameworks are layered above other lower-level software frameworks.
--
PhilipEskelin
See
ComponentFramework or
ComponentFrameworkDefinition for relevant discussions.
See also
WhiteBoxFramework.